Harry Overton
harry_overton.pdf | |
File Size: | 131 kb |
File Type: |
Paolo/William/Bradley - planning - marks
Research into genre and the band is reasonably detailed although lacks convincing insight into the genre
Analyses of videos with lots of text, one powerpoint and screen grabs. There is detailed discussion but analysis of representations and application of theory is superficial. Analysis of CD covers is detailed but discussion of band's representation lacks insight and there's no impact.
Moodboard analysis is superficial.
Detailed lyrical analysis.
Good audience feedback to pitches.
Storyboarded in detail but no shotlist. Thorough if plainly presented costume and props list - which will have to be evident in the video (trench coat/backpacks etc)
Lighting explanation is good .
Recce report is brief and may lack some areas suggested.
Incomplete drafts of printwork with no audience feedback.
Overall presentation is between good and basic.
11/12 C/D
Matt/Liam/Dan
Clear and reasonably detailed breakdown of artist and genre with occasional lapses in grammar and vocabulary. You might want to intoduce terms such as social justice/disparity and materialism/anti-materialism (not flashy)
prezi and powerpoint presentations - of videos - presentation is good but Blunt analysis is superficial and unconvincing - you need more on band representation - you need to sit down with me for this
analysis of julie is very good - detailed and thorough
no impact section despite repeated reminders
Good lyrical analysis and mood board
storyboards are poorly presented and incomplete (no shot types on some)
good recce report and shotlist
reasonably proficient costume list although they must be evident in the video
lighting tests are proficient and again the effects should be evident in the video
print layouts but no audience feedback on them
reasonably proficient audience feedback to pitches but information gained could be more detailed and of more clear relevance
12 C
Deji/Jac/Luca/William
Good detailed and well presented breakdown on genre and artist using prezi and powerpoint.
Jack's video analysis is very good. detailed, well expressed and insightful.
Luca's is well presented with a few sp errors and a few superficial points..though overall it's good.
Deji's is well presented and well expressed.(could discuss authenticity. established shot?)
William's is very detailed and very well presented and expressed. (All need to add to impact section)
Excellent CD cover analysis but I couldn't see (or open) the impact section.
Good storyboards but they are poorly presented
I'd change the format of the recce report into a table/proforma and the costume section needs more detail on mise-en-scene decisions.
No shotlist or print work layouts or audience feedback to printwork.
14/20 B
Finlegh/Gianluca
inaccurate information on homepage
Genre and artist is well presented and expressed but lacks detailed discussion of the artist's change of image or features of the genre such as authenticity.
Video analyses - well presented with reasonable expression and insight / impact section is unconvincing
CD analyses are detailed with reasonable expression but I'd have liked more on representation and social realism v glamorisation mirroring the marketing of the band's image
No audience feedback to pitches/rough cut/ layouts
detailed storyboard and shotlist, clear recce and costume list - no drafts of printwork
11/12 C/D
Matt/Callum
genre and artist research is well presented and detailed although I'm unconvinced by the ideology section
video analyses are basic in presentation - there are reasonable insights but discussion of social realism is needed
cd analyses presentation quite basic- there is some detail but clearer insights needed on representations
no impact sections good storyboard and pitch feedback, incomplete recce report and no shotlist
no costume list/explanation and no printwork drafts
10 E
Research into genre and the band is reasonably detailed although lacks convincing insight into the genre
Analyses of videos with lots of text, one powerpoint and screen grabs. There is detailed discussion but analysis of representations and application of theory is superficial. Analysis of CD covers is detailed but discussion of band's representation lacks insight and there's no impact.
Moodboard analysis is superficial.
Detailed lyrical analysis.
Good audience feedback to pitches.
Storyboarded in detail but no shotlist. Thorough if plainly presented costume and props list - which will have to be evident in the video (trench coat/backpacks etc)
Lighting explanation is good .
Recce report is brief and may lack some areas suggested.
Incomplete drafts of printwork with no audience feedback.
Overall presentation is between good and basic.
11/12 C/D
Matt/Liam/Dan
Clear and reasonably detailed breakdown of artist and genre with occasional lapses in grammar and vocabulary. You might want to intoduce terms such as social justice/disparity and materialism/anti-materialism (not flashy)
prezi and powerpoint presentations - of videos - presentation is good but Blunt analysis is superficial and unconvincing - you need more on band representation - you need to sit down with me for this
analysis of julie is very good - detailed and thorough
no impact section despite repeated reminders
Good lyrical analysis and mood board
storyboards are poorly presented and incomplete (no shot types on some)
good recce report and shotlist
reasonably proficient costume list although they must be evident in the video
lighting tests are proficient and again the effects should be evident in the video
print layouts but no audience feedback on them
reasonably proficient audience feedback to pitches but information gained could be more detailed and of more clear relevance
12 C
Deji/Jac/Luca/William
Good detailed and well presented breakdown on genre and artist using prezi and powerpoint.
Jack's video analysis is very good. detailed, well expressed and insightful.
Luca's is well presented with a few sp errors and a few superficial points..though overall it's good.
Deji's is well presented and well expressed.(could discuss authenticity. established shot?)
William's is very detailed and very well presented and expressed. (All need to add to impact section)
Excellent CD cover analysis but I couldn't see (or open) the impact section.
Good storyboards but they are poorly presented
I'd change the format of the recce report into a table/proforma and the costume section needs more detail on mise-en-scene decisions.
No shotlist or print work layouts or audience feedback to printwork.
14/20 B
Finlegh/Gianluca
inaccurate information on homepage
Genre and artist is well presented and expressed but lacks detailed discussion of the artist's change of image or features of the genre such as authenticity.
Video analyses - well presented with reasonable expression and insight / impact section is unconvincing
CD analyses are detailed with reasonable expression but I'd have liked more on representation and social realism v glamorisation mirroring the marketing of the band's image
No audience feedback to pitches/rough cut/ layouts
detailed storyboard and shotlist, clear recce and costume list - no drafts of printwork
11/12 C/D
Matt/Callum
genre and artist research is well presented and detailed although I'm unconvinced by the ideology section
video analyses are basic in presentation - there are reasonable insights but discussion of social realism is needed
cd analyses presentation quite basic- there is some detail but clearer insights needed on representations
no impact sections good storyboard and pitch feedback, incomplete recce report and no shotlist
no costume list/explanation and no printwork drafts
10 E