Matt and Callum
www.a2mediaproject2015.weebly.com
Planning:
Production:
Evaluation:
Q1.Some interesting points on conventions but you could be more specific about social realism and styles of film-making that influenced you along with cd covers. I have sat there and explained and showed you different films which you haven’t mentioned.
Q2. Completely fails to analyse texts or discuss relevant links. You don’t even discuss the print work.
Q3. Needs clearer explanation about different stages of feedback. Nothing on responses to drafts. What is a rough copy? What about the pitch?
Q4. A range of new technologies discussed but little detail on Final Cut or Photoshop or the benefits of social media.
Currently Level 2
Paolo/Bradley/William
www.bmppwc.weebly.com
Planning:
Production:
Evaluation:
Q1. Why would the audience ‘identify’ with people living in a forest? Proof read. Needs more convincing details on conventions/representations you noticed/followed on videos and cds. Also needs more on conventions of the action/post apocalyptic genre as you’ve ignored m/e/c in your video.
Q2. Nothing on print work. Discussion of conventions of the video is long winded and vague. Why aren’t you discussing representations/ideologies?
Q3. Very little and poorly explained audience feedback. You’ve ignored all instruction regarding printwork and social media.
Q4. Is better but still could make more points on Final Cut and needs to discuss Photoshop.
Level 2
Zak/Harry
www.zakharrymedia.weebly.com
Planning:
Production:
Evaluation:
No evidence 0 – Late again
Luca/Deji/Jack/William
www.ljwd.weebly.com
Planning:
Production:
Evaluation:
Q1. Extremely limited and brief response. No discussion of other videos, representations or ideologies. Very weak. Level 1.
Q2. Not done
Q3. I’d have liked a more concise and detailed record of audience feedback to the pitch and the rough cut and more on the print work.
Q4. Not done
Level 1.
Gianluca/Finlegh
www.gfproductions.weebly.com
Planning:
Production:
Evaluation:
Q1. I’m still unconvinced by your discussion of the image of the band from a conventional indie ideology (which you need to clearer on) to the more hedonistic and glamorised recent image. It also needs more examples from covers and videos of the group.
Some of your terminology discussing your video is weak e.g high and low shots.
Q2. Some good ideas but needs more on the similarities in narratives of the printwork/digipac and the design and ideologies.
Q3. Not done
Q4. Not done.
L2.
Dan/Matt/Niall
www.dmnjfs.weebly.com
Planning:
Production:
Evaluation:
Q1. Well expressed start but you need more examples of group’s representations that you researched and found to be minimalist. Examples of conventions fails to discuss Goodwin and is also very lacking in any relevant detail. Again, you need to refer more closely to examples, representations and ideologies.
Q2. A good start. Give examples of filters you used. You discuss the printwork quite well but then fail to discuss in detail how you conveyed the protagonist’s despair in the video.
Q3. Needs more specific detail on print work feedback as well as on feedback to rough cut.
Q4. I movie is a simple program, can’t you discuss what you’ve done on Final Cut Express? ‘ghostly effect’ is extremely vague. See me about terminology. Also, why don’t you go into more details on Photoshop?
Level 2
www.a2mediaproject2015.weebly.com
Planning:
Production:
Evaluation:
Q1.Some interesting points on conventions but you could be more specific about social realism and styles of film-making that influenced you along with cd covers. I have sat there and explained and showed you different films which you haven’t mentioned.
Q2. Completely fails to analyse texts or discuss relevant links. You don’t even discuss the print work.
Q3. Needs clearer explanation about different stages of feedback. Nothing on responses to drafts. What is a rough copy? What about the pitch?
Q4. A range of new technologies discussed but little detail on Final Cut or Photoshop or the benefits of social media.
Currently Level 2
Paolo/Bradley/William
www.bmppwc.weebly.com
Planning:
Production:
Evaluation:
Q1. Why would the audience ‘identify’ with people living in a forest? Proof read. Needs more convincing details on conventions/representations you noticed/followed on videos and cds. Also needs more on conventions of the action/post apocalyptic genre as you’ve ignored m/e/c in your video.
Q2. Nothing on print work. Discussion of conventions of the video is long winded and vague. Why aren’t you discussing representations/ideologies?
Q3. Very little and poorly explained audience feedback. You’ve ignored all instruction regarding printwork and social media.
Q4. Is better but still could make more points on Final Cut and needs to discuss Photoshop.
Level 2
Zak/Harry
www.zakharrymedia.weebly.com
Planning:
Production:
Evaluation:
No evidence 0 – Late again
Luca/Deji/Jack/William
www.ljwd.weebly.com
Planning:
Production:
Evaluation:
Q1. Extremely limited and brief response. No discussion of other videos, representations or ideologies. Very weak. Level 1.
Q2. Not done
Q3. I’d have liked a more concise and detailed record of audience feedback to the pitch and the rough cut and more on the print work.
Q4. Not done
Level 1.
Gianluca/Finlegh
www.gfproductions.weebly.com
Planning:
Production:
Evaluation:
Q1. I’m still unconvinced by your discussion of the image of the band from a conventional indie ideology (which you need to clearer on) to the more hedonistic and glamorised recent image. It also needs more examples from covers and videos of the group.
Some of your terminology discussing your video is weak e.g high and low shots.
Q2. Some good ideas but needs more on the similarities in narratives of the printwork/digipac and the design and ideologies.
Q3. Not done
Q4. Not done.
L2.
Dan/Matt/Niall
www.dmnjfs.weebly.com
Planning:
Production:
Evaluation:
Q1. Well expressed start but you need more examples of group’s representations that you researched and found to be minimalist. Examples of conventions fails to discuss Goodwin and is also very lacking in any relevant detail. Again, you need to refer more closely to examples, representations and ideologies.
Q2. A good start. Give examples of filters you used. You discuss the printwork quite well but then fail to discuss in detail how you conveyed the protagonist’s despair in the video.
Q3. Needs more specific detail on print work feedback as well as on feedback to rough cut.
Q4. I movie is a simple program, can’t you discuss what you’ve done on Final Cut Express? ‘ghostly effect’ is extremely vague. See me about terminology. Also, why don’t you go into more details on Photoshop?
Level 2